nikon super coolscan 8000 edluniquz finger sleeves

If you click on each of the pictures above you will see 10 wide versions, again uncorrected. I do caution people to download the lastest scanner driver if they run Windows XP. photographyreview.com The scanning software,Nikon Scan 3.0,appears to be similar to that provided with the other current Nikon scanners like the 4000ED. The tray eject motor quit after a month of use. carreview.com | There may be issues and subtleties that only arise after the unit has been used for some length of time, and possibly as well only after its been on the market for a while. Digital ICE (Digital ICE cubed) technologies were developed by Applied Science Fiction Inc. Material Processing Solutions & Robot Vision, 4,000-dpi true optical-resolution scanning, 14-bit A/D converter incorporating 16-/8-bit output for vivid images, Multiple film format scanning (120/220, 35mm [135], 16mm, etc. Many have said the glass MF holder is necessary--I'm still determining that. Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best Selling in Scanners, Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- You may also like, With it's successor going for twice as much on the used market (when it can be found) and Nikon's shipping schedule as inconsistent as it can be just when you're looking to them for the newer LS-9000, the 8000ED becomes a real alternative, especially when, with a little research, you begin to realize that even though the 9000 solved the few problems the 8000 has, those problems are minor and always ready for a simple work around that can result in scans to be proud of even if the process might become somewhat lengthened. Despite being years out of production, large, noisy, and slow, it still beats everything else for the money. ), Customized 10,000-pixel 3-line monochrome linear CCD, Newly developed custom CCD reduces image noise and provides clear resolution, Proprietary LED technology ensures consistently accurate color reproduction, The LED and lens together cause dispersed lighting, resulting in smoother picture grain, Exclusive SCANNER NIKKOR ED high-resolution/high-performance lens (14 elements in 6 groups including 6 ED glass elements) for reduced color aberration and minimized image distortion, New scene analysis function, featuring intelligent tone and color auto-correction, enables quality reproduction of even orange-tinted negative film, Multi-sample scanning (2/4/8/16 times; selectable) for images virtually free of noise, High-speed IEEE1394 interface (IEEE1394 board and cable included in the package for users who do not have the interface), Improved Color Management System accuracy, Digital ICE automatic correction function, Digital ICE (Image Correction & Enhancement) removes dust, scratches and finger prints from scanned images, Digital ROC (Reconstruction of Color) restores faded images to true, brilliant color by determining ideal color tone for each image, Digital GEM (Grain Equalization & Management) equalizes image grain resulting in a smoother overall image. now i have to send it for service. Otherwise they have been scaled to the same resolution. The other contender is, of course, thePolaroid PrintScan 120. -Top-quality scans -dust and scratches less noticeable than flatbed -excellent color and contrast with a minimum of post-processing -professional build quality -firewire for speedy transfer -uses standard cables for power, firewire -MUCH cheaper than anything like it (but not for long). Overall, I am beyond impressed with it. Pity about the Nikon''s ED lens which was less sharp than the Canon. Also, a number of people on the filmscanner list have had similar problems and one person has had the problem with two examples of the scanner. I didnt spend much time with the manual. If you are running a PC that does not have a Firewire card, you will have to install one. It works PLENTY fast for 35mm film and smaller, and if that''s all you do, then, again, get to 4000 ED and save yourself another grand or more. Ive returned the SS120 because I felt the Nikon was very slightly sharper and, more importantly, Digital ICE really worked and I want it. made the fatal mistake of touching the film tray and it jammed up and wont reset. It took about 2.5 minutes for this particular scan while the Imacon took exactly 10 minutes. I decided to res-down the Nikon scans for my primary comparisons but I also referred to the original 4000 dpi scan when subjectively evaluating resolution. Serious film photographers who want the best scans for the money, want to do it themselves, but for whom the 9000 is now out of range. Anyway, I hope these comments are useful and thanks for the great site. In mid-July 2001 my colleagueIan LyonsofComputer Darkroompublished a review of thePolaroid PrintScan 120scanner on his web site. This test report describes the test object as we have received and tested it. I cropped the very bottom of the frame as it was uninteresting. The 8000 makes excellent 35mm scans, but not visibly better than the V. 35mm is noticeably better than the Epson flatbed, as expected. ThePolaroid Printscan 120and theNikon 8000have been eagerly awaited during the spring of 2001 as they both potentially represent the first high-quality yetaffordablemedium format film scanners to be made available to photographers. I dont own an 8000 and therefore am not in a position to answer additional technical or operational questions. I have found that, contrary to the instructions and common wisdom, I get sharper scans with the emulsion side up in the supplied 120 holder. It has a small amount of operating noise, but nothing too objectionable. The Imacon Photo can handle film up to 6X17cm in length, has superior film handling capabilities and comes with one of the industrys top-rated scanning software packages. One of the clips broke off, so I used screws to pull the holder down onto the film. I dont know at this time what Nikons plans are for Europe, Australia and elsewhere. Dont buy a scanner based on reading the spec sheet!). this thing is VERY sensitive so watch it. I get very occasional banding, which seems to only occur during very hot days. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. In conclusion, while the canon was sharper, I don''t think I could have lived with it losing details in the highlights, so I would have chosen the nikon for its greater tonal ranges. Regulars to this site will know that my reference scanner is theImacon Flextight Photo. roadbikereview.com | Who would want one? Since there are three separate CCD lines in the LS-8000 (theres only one on all other CoolScan scanners), any small difference in sensitivity between the Nth CCD pixel in each of the three CCD lines can cause streaking when the same calibration data is used for each of the three CCD lines.I solved this problem in VueScan by only using one CCD line. It is not a miracle machine in that it does not revive old negatives to get prints equivalent to the old darkroom prints, but it does get a good and usable result. The 8000 occupies a very narrow and specific niche. However, the holders will actually hold at least 612 (cant remember if 617 would fit). No problem. Youre Utah shot would have shown this perfectly in the sky if the sky were a bit lighter. Took awhile, but I would rather have it right than rushed. It took me awhile to actually use this scanner. I scan almost exclusively Widelux and 6x7 negs. I did not test any of the extra features such as their ICE technology for removing dust or GEM for reducing film grain. This would produce a 28 X 40 print from the Nikon at a printer resolution of 240 DPI. What I know about the scanner, and my impressions of it, are contained on this page. Works great! Now, maybe thats what its called in Japan. Heard it was very good. Even as I write this review in January, 2011, the Nikon Coolscan 8000 ED is still the best (probably the only) value for high-quality scans outside of expensive drum scans. Because the Epson's files always need a contrast and sharpness boost, dust and scratches are emphasized. Masks are a teeny bit large, allowing light leaks to fog the scan at the edges. However, since I don''t have the possible tens of thousands of dollars it would cost to buy a drum scanner, I can''t really knock the speed either. Frankly, if I were selecting a scanner today Id be tempted to choose the Nikon because of its significant price advantage. Get one before the price follows the 9000 into orbit. Warranty work done well. This is because the scanner has two motors one to roughly position the filmholder before the scan starts, and the other to do 4000 dpi stepping. | Concrete Contractor. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. The key points are that the scanner will handle film up to 6X9cm in size, including 35mm. When applying the usual processing tools in Photoshop, including the application of an appropriate amount ofUnsharp MaskandLevels / Curvesadjustments, these difference essentially disappear. Of course, I can''t knock the filesizethis is unavoidable with images as large as this scanner is capable of producing. The above are the test scans. I had three choices. It also reduces the price gap with theNikon LS-8000andPolaroid SprintScan 120to the point where purchasing the superior Imacon becomes a not unreasonable choice. ICE, ROC, and GEM don''t work with black and white. Ian thinks very highly of the Polaroid. Stop cheaping-out and hire professional translators. All original content found nowhere else on the web, No Pop Up Google Sense ads - Our advertisers are photo related, FREE - User Forum. Only the reduced film handling capability would deter me. :), I''ve had my hand on a fair few models and brands of desktop film scanners, and, I have to say, this is by far the best one I''ve used yet. Ive learned a lot. All Rights Reserved. I read your review of the Nikon 8000ED, as well as the readers comment posted below your review. In terms of sharpness, resolution and contrast, rating the Imacon as a 10, I would rate the Nikon at 9.7. Easy to install and use; the Nikon software is easy to learn. I was curious, of course, to see how the Nikon would compare and so this test includes a comparison with a scan of the same transparency on both the Nikon and the Imacon. photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation. I don't want to rehash what everybody else says about the scanner. Mais attention : aucun (bon) vendeur amricain ne s'autorise baisser le prix de vente pour la douane ou dclarer l'article vendu comme un "gift". ill come well within reach with the 8000ED. In short, I''m pleased with this purchase, and am looking forward to delving into my archives for the good images I never did anything with. Digital ICE does not seem to take much longer, I don't know what people are talking about. Having tried the Hamrick Vuescan software, I have returned to the Nikon 3.1 scanning program. the most useful info i can tell you is that i have had $15 drum scans done for me of medium format and 3 out of 4 look great and are about 100mb. I have been using Vuescan, which is adequate, especially for the price, but the documentation is very thin, and many aspects about the program are cryptic. Also, the Nikon color scans produce very little noise, while the Epson color scans are full of noise. with 6x7 and ICE. The unit ships with holders for mounted 35mm slides, uncut 35mm film strips and Brownie (oopsmedium format) film. I can compare the 8000 to two other scanners: the Coolscan V, and the Epson V500. Epson Perfection 2450 (useless fuzzy junk). Now, there was no holder for a 24x65mm Widelux neg either, so eventually I bought the $500 glass holder. This $12 gains you access to a wealth of information including all our past and future video tutorials on such topics as Lightroom, Capture One, Printing, Silverfast is expensive. If you are not already aware of it you might be interested in finding out about my latest publishing venture,The Luminous Landscape Video Journal, a quarterly video magazine on DVD, featuring travel stories, product review like this one, and tutorials and interviews with famous photographers. Donkey, Potties, and Hose San Miguel de Allende, Mexico. Something went wrong. I was disappointed to see that the maximum scan length for medium format is 9cm. It just requires a little patience, which is far more affordable to most than the more costly drum scanners would be. After the better part of an afternoon testing the unit, here are my initial impressions. It is in multiple languages. If youre looking for a very high quality medium format scanner at a reasonable price and can live with a maximum 6X9cm film handling capability, the Nikon Super Coolscan 8000ED may well be the scanner for you. Add-on glass holder is fabulous. item 1 Nikon Super CoolScan LS-8000 ED Dedicated Film Scanner 4000 dpi with 4 holders, item 2 Nikon Super CoolScan 9000 ED Photo, Slide & Film Scanner, item 3 Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner Model LS-8000, item 4 Nikon Super CoolScan 9000 ED Photo, Slide & Film Scanner (with film holders). Yes, there is a lot of work in getting a print that matches a slide, but this is what you have to do, what photographers have always had to do. One of the most read user forums on the internet. Dont use shaprening, curves (unless absolutely necessary, or any other settings except ICE) This gives you a high quality raw file that you then use in photoshop to get the best detail from. Ian has reported that the Polaroid 120 competes quite nicely with the Imacon but that the Imacon pulls ahead in ultimate quality. Luminous-Landscape is a membership site. Please note that thats all these comments areinitial impressions. This represents about 75% of the full frame as shot. It has some flaws, as discussed above, but what product doesnt? However, the Nikon 8000 far surpasses the Epson when it comes to color. This report is of a brief hands-on test of the newNikon Super Coolscan 8000 EDscanner. If you need detail in the dark areas, use 14 bit and 16x passover and you will get good detail. My issue though is with the 120 holder, though the 35mm holder had a somewhat similar design. Currently Im waiting for another LS-8000 which I hope works better than the first. My concern is that in addition to appearing to be perilously close to requiring breaking force to open and close, eventually these fittings will wear and become less secure just the opposite problem. still happy i got one just wish it would have been as durable as a tank since it weighs as much as one. Perhaps if people are not getting totally sharp scans, get it calibrated under warranty if you can. Since its inception in 1999 LuLa has become the world's largest site devoted to the art, craft, and technology of photography. If you would like to see the German version of this test report, please, click at the German flag at the top of the page to open it. If your film is so poorly exposed that you have a massive contrast between blacks and whites, you can always do 2 scans and layer them, one exposed for highlights, and one for shadows. What a difference! These are just some comments you might find useful. The most glaring issue with the documentation, which had me and everyone atVistekchuckling, is that the manual calls what we refer to in the English speaking world as medium format, as Browniefilm. I have had the 8000 for 4 months or so and so far am pretty impressed with the general quality, it can be a bit soft if you dont load the med.film in accurately, but when its sharp its good.definately not up to drum scan quality but what do you expect for the price. J'ai achet cet excellent scanner Nikon aux States un vendeur que je classe en premier parmi tous les vendeurs que j'ai frquents sur eBay. SLOW. My first and really only negative comment about the Nikon 8000s mechanical design, is the film holders. Digital ICE (Digital ICE cubed), Digital ICE, Digital ROC and Digital GEM are trademarks of Applied Science Fiction Inc. What would the Nikon 8000 be like? At today's used price, the Coolscan LS-8000ED is more than hard to beat. 35mm and slide holders work well. The 4000 dpi stepper motor only has 90 mm of travel, just likethe SprintScan 120. I''m using it on a PowerMac G4 850MHz dual CPU with 1.5gigs of RAM, so it''s not the computer that gets bogged down when trying to run the scannerthe scanner and software themselves are just slow when handling such complex algorithms (it''s always about all the algorithms used to process information). The 8000 scans, even without ICE, produce less in the way of dust and scratches. Scan with the Nikon at 3200; res-down the Nikon 4000 dpi scan to match the Imacon; or compare scans that had a 25% difference in resolution. What you see is what I scanned. I will keep checking that, and will try to keep my room cool. The 9000's price is now skyrocketing out of sight. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. The primary quandary that I faced in doing a comparison with the Imacon was that the Nikon is a 4000 DPI scanner while the Imacon Photo is 3200 DPI. Warranty repair went well. The 35 mm and slide holders work great, however I just couldn't live with the lousy 120mm film holder they supplied. I''ve yet to do a 6x7 with ICE and multi-sampling -- I think it will take an evening. Bottom line? Nikon 8000 Imacon Flextight Photo. It took, from sticking the film in the scanner to saving it, roughly an hour-and-a-half to scan a 6x7 at 4000dpi, single pass, 8-bit color depth, with Digital ICE, ROC, and GEM turned on (just wish these things worked with black and whitethey''re supposed to, but trust me, they don''t). Ed Hamrick, author of the highly regarded VueScan software has just written to say that his latest version supporting the LS-8000 is now available. This makes it impossible to scan 6X12cm or 6X17 panoramics. In the U.S. the scanner ships with the full version ofAltamiras Genuine Fractals 2.0. Our website contains over 5300 articles on almost every topic, camera, lens and printer you can imagine.